<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outside a Thunderstorm is brewing&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/</link>
	<description>The perfect single and multiplayer customizable card game for roleplaying and strategy gamers.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Siddin</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>The templating has always been adjacent characters gain XXX, just look at the dev hero. Adjacent devs get defend +10. 
Uthanak's Tower: Adjacent characters gain +5 AC and Riposte +5. 
Adulation:Evil Characters Only. Spend Order: Attach this card to this cleric. While this card is attached, adjacent evil characters gain the ability: "Spend React: After an adjacent character suffers one or more wounds, inflict the wounds on this character instead".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The templating has always been adjacent characters gain XXX, just look at the dev hero. Adjacent devs get defend +10.<br />
Uthanak&#8217;s Tower: Adjacent characters gain +5 AC and Riposte +5.<br />
Adulation:Evil Characters Only. Spend Order: Attach this card to this cleric. While this card is attached, adjacent evil characters gain the ability: &#8220;Spend React: After an adjacent character suffers one or more wounds, inflict the wounds on this character instead&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, Scyrax works from the third as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, Scyrax works from the third as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence J Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence J Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>The claim about Warlords was that only one would be a direct MRP - and that was Logan Ebonwoulfe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The claim about Warlords was that only one would be a direct MRP - and that was Logan Ebonwoulfe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>The wording on the gargoyle trait is a valid issue, but since it doesn't say "permanently gains" the trait, I would have to agree that it is only while that character is adjacent.

Overall, not a WOW, but very decent.  He will certainly be interesting to play.

So far, all the warlords I think, besides the Chosen Summoner WL, kind of need to be in the first or second rank to be effective.  A rogues' dream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wording on the gargoyle trait is a valid issue, but since it doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;permanently gains&#8221; the trait, I would have to agree that it is only while that character is adjacent.</p>
<p>Overall, not a WOW, but very decent.  He will certainly be interesting to play.</p>
<p>So far, all the warlords I think, besides the Chosen Summoner WL, kind of need to be in the first or second rank to be effective.  A rogues&#8217; dream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam238</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam238</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>I though there was only 1 new Warlord and all the rest were MRP's or Experienced Characters, but it's not looking that way anymore.  Did you change the direction you were heading for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I though there was only 1 new Warlord and all the rest were MRP&#8217;s or Experienced Characters, but it&#8217;s not looking that way anymore.  Did you change the direction you were heading for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Hummel</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Then it would be better if it says:

Dwarfs gain the gargoyle trait while adjacent to bender. Would be clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then it would be better if it says:</p>
<p>Dwarfs gain the gargoyle trait while adjacent to bender. Would be clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gigi</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>@ Afterda:
ANSWER: Of course he lose the Garg Trait.

CYA
G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Afterda:<br />
ANSWER: Of course he lose the Garg Trait.</p>
<p>CYA<br />
G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afterda</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>afterda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-590</guid>
		<description>To Karura:

If there is a descent amount of gargoyles in the base set i can.t see why you cannot play him second rank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Karura:</p>
<p>If there is a descent amount of gargoyles in the base set i can.t see why you cannot play him second rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karura</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Karura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Okay, three clerics, and all of them are more Frontclerics than Supporters, that means no Cleric for me the first Set :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, three clerics, and all of them are more Frontclerics than Supporters, that means no Cleric for me the first Set <img src='http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afterda</title>
		<link>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>afterda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.warlordccg.de/blog/2008/07/10/outside-a-thunderstorm-is-brewing/#comment-588</guid>
		<description>IMPRESSIVE !!! 
But i have one question... 
After an adjacent dwarf to Thekk moves to another position or rank does he lose the gargoyle trait?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMPRESSIVE !!!<br />
But i have one question&#8230;<br />
After an adjacent dwarf to Thekk moves to another position or rank does he lose the gargoyle trait?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
